<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for OriolesProspects.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oriolesprospects.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oriolesprospects.com</link>
	<description>Scouting, news and analysis on all of the Orioles&#039; baseball prospects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=7344</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Questions Answered by Jordan</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/2010/07/29/all-questions-answered-2/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?p=4943#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>1. Could be a .320 hitter with 30 HRs. 

2. They will try Klein as a starter first, but he has more than enough stuff to become a closer if starting fails. 

3. They would have the #4 selection in the 2011 draft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Could be a .320 hitter with 30 HRs. </p>
<p>2. They will try Klein as a starter first, but he has more than enough stuff to become a closer if starting fails. </p>
<p>3. They would have the #4 selection in the 2011 draft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Questions Answered by SK</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/2010/07/29/all-questions-answered-2/#comment-2766</link>
		<dc:creator>SK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?p=4943#comment-2766</guid>
		<description>Melewski is reporting that Sawyer signed today, as well. Lots of good news over the last two days - hope it keeps up over the weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melewski is reporting that Sawyer signed today, as well. Lots of good news over the last two days &#8211; hope it keeps up over the weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Questions Answered by K.Watts</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/2010/07/29/all-questions-answered-2/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator>K.Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?p=4943#comment-2764</guid>
		<description>1. Although it is very early in the whole developmental process, what do you expect from Manny Machado&#039;s production in the Majors on average?

2. Is it possible for Dan Klein to be the closer of the future or just a nice reliever in the Majors?

3. If the Orioles are unable to sign Manny Machado (I fully expect him to sign), do the Orioles get a compensator pick at the same position in next years draft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Although it is very early in the whole developmental process, what do you expect from Manny Machado&#8217;s production in the Majors on average?</p>
<p>2. Is it possible for Dan Klein to be the closer of the future or just a nice reliever in the Majors?</p>
<p>3. If the Orioles are unable to sign Manny Machado (I fully expect him to sign), do the Orioles get a compensator pick at the same position in next years draft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Orioles Snag Wynn Pelzer from Padres in Return for Tejada by Don</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/2010/07/29/orioles-snag-wynn-pelzer-from-padres-in-return-for-tejada/#comment-2763</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?p=4954#comment-2763</guid>
		<description>Mechanics write up:

You here the comments about him and you think he is damaged goods mechanics wise and erratic that is distend for the bullpen.  Nope, I am not buying that Kool-Aid at all.  BA thinks he is too active and too much movement pre-delivery.  I can care less if the guy stands on his head during the pre-loading phase as it has more to do mental than any physical.  I have seen some of the strangest deliveries from Fernando and Satchel, but both of those guys had flawless mechanics that led to extremely long and successful careers.

Once he wraps up his pre-loading phase, he is a bit up right in his stance.  It is not the end of the world, but it is not a cause for his erratic strike zone issues entirely.  I would live with it because it seems that it allows him to do the two following things.

1.  He rocks his shoulders back, but both arms and elbows are below the shoulder girdle at all times.  It looks as though his non throwing lead arm is above him, but it is just false reality.  The angle of his shoulders never falls out of synchronization with his arms and he places little stress on is throwing shoulder and elbow.

2. It seems that rock shoulder allows him to get movement forward and downhill.


His arm slot is slightly behind him and pointing at about somewhere between 12 and1 o’clock, which is okay, but I would rather like to see 11 o’clock angle from a right handed pitcher to take away more pressure on the entire arm.  His plant is directly in line and never crosses his body to throw.

The issue for his erratic strike zone discipline is most likely attributed to his follow through.  If you look at the 12 second mark of the back stop angle, you will see that his hand is around his left knee and his back is about a 45 degree angle.  He whips his back leg around and pushed towards first base a bit too much.

If I were his coach, I would want to see his right arm push closer to his foot and have it mid-shin.  His back would be flatter and it could force the leg to lunge forward a bit more.  The end result would be a consistent release point and curb control issues.  It could increase velocity as well.

Overall, he is a very good prospect that has the foundation for quality stuff.  There is nothing showing me at this point that bullpen is his future.  He has the makeup, size, power, and drive for a sustainable innings eater.  He just needs some very minor changes IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mechanics write up:</p>
<p>You here the comments about him and you think he is damaged goods mechanics wise and erratic that is distend for the bullpen.  Nope, I am not buying that Kool-Aid at all.  BA thinks he is too active and too much movement pre-delivery.  I can care less if the guy stands on his head during the pre-loading phase as it has more to do mental than any physical.  I have seen some of the strangest deliveries from Fernando and Satchel, but both of those guys had flawless mechanics that led to extremely long and successful careers.</p>
<p>Once he wraps up his pre-loading phase, he is a bit up right in his stance.  It is not the end of the world, but it is not a cause for his erratic strike zone issues entirely.  I would live with it because it seems that it allows him to do the two following things.</p>
<p>1.  He rocks his shoulders back, but both arms and elbows are below the shoulder girdle at all times.  It looks as though his non throwing lead arm is above him, but it is just false reality.  The angle of his shoulders never falls out of synchronization with his arms and he places little stress on is throwing shoulder and elbow.</p>
<p>2. It seems that rock shoulder allows him to get movement forward and downhill.</p>
<p>His arm slot is slightly behind him and pointing at about somewhere between 12 and1 o’clock, which is okay, but I would rather like to see 11 o’clock angle from a right handed pitcher to take away more pressure on the entire arm.  His plant is directly in line and never crosses his body to throw.</p>
<p>The issue for his erratic strike zone discipline is most likely attributed to his follow through.  If you look at the 12 second mark of the back stop angle, you will see that his hand is around his left knee and his back is about a 45 degree angle.  He whips his back leg around and pushed towards first base a bit too much.</p>
<p>If I were his coach, I would want to see his right arm push closer to his foot and have it mid-shin.  His back would be flatter and it could force the leg to lunge forward a bit more.  The end result would be a consistent release point and curb control issues.  It could increase velocity as well.</p>
<p>Overall, he is a very good prospect that has the foundation for quality stuff.  There is nothing showing me at this point that bullpen is his future.  He has the makeup, size, power, and drive for a sustainable innings eater.  He just needs some very minor changes IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Orioles Sign 10th Round Pick Clayton Schrader by Don</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/op-news/orioles-sign-10th-round-pick-clayton-schrader/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?post_type=op-news&#038;p=4971#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>It is a bit perplexing that Orioles are having a bit of difficulty signing the top drafted players, but the entire landscape seems to be following a similar path.  You usually have a tough time with one or two &quot;bonus babies&quot;, but this is a little much. 

First round picks will go down to the wire.  I feel the same slot in next years class will be alot better than 2010.  Outside of Harper, Machado, and Tallion, there is 5-10 players in 2011 better than the fourth best prospects (Drew Pomeranz).  I even think there are two picks better than anyone in the 2010 class, Purke and Rendon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a bit perplexing that Orioles are having a bit of difficulty signing the top drafted players, but the entire landscape seems to be following a similar path.  You usually have a tough time with one or two &#8220;bonus babies&#8221;, but this is a little much. </p>
<p>First round picks will go down to the wire.  I feel the same slot in next years class will be alot better than 2010.  Outside of Harper, Machado, and Tallion, there is 5-10 players in 2011 better than the fourth best prospects (Drew Pomeranz).  I even think there are two picks better than anyone in the 2010 class, Purke and Rendon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Questions Answered by Jordan</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/2010/07/29/all-questions-answered-2/#comment-2758</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?p=4943#comment-2758</guid>
		<description>No problem. Let&#039;s see: 

1. Machado - We knew the negotiations were going to go down to the wire. 

3. Dan Klein - I believe Joe Jordan said the negotiations are going much slower than expected. But he should sign soon. 

4. Trent Mummey - We knew he&#039;d sign quickly. 

5. Connor Narron - We knew this was going to be a tough, but it should happen soon. 

6. Dixon Anderson - Sophomore, so he can still go back to college. We&#039;ll probably sign him, but close to the deadline, which was expected. 

7. Matt Bywater - Was expected to sign quickly, and I honestly can&#039;t tell you why he hasn&#039;t signed yet, I&#039;m shocked. 

8. Wynston Sawyer - We also knew this was going to be a tough sign, and he&#039;ll probably get an overslot bonus. HS teammate told me he expects Sawyer to sign, though. 

9. Parker Bridwell - High upside. If I had to pick any top 10 draftee to go unsigned, I&#039;d go with Bridwell. 

10. Clayton Schrader - We signed him today. 

Overall, I think our negotiations with Klein and Bywater have gone much, much slower than we expected. But as for the others, some sort of delay is normal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem. Let&#8217;s see: </p>
<p>1. Machado &#8211; We knew the negotiations were going to go down to the wire. </p>
<p>3. Dan Klein &#8211; I believe Joe Jordan said the negotiations are going much slower than expected. But he should sign soon. </p>
<p>4. Trent Mummey &#8211; We knew he&#8217;d sign quickly. </p>
<p>5. Connor Narron &#8211; We knew this was going to be a tough, but it should happen soon. </p>
<p>6. Dixon Anderson &#8211; Sophomore, so he can still go back to college. We&#8217;ll probably sign him, but close to the deadline, which was expected. </p>
<p>7. Matt Bywater &#8211; Was expected to sign quickly, and I honestly can&#8217;t tell you why he hasn&#8217;t signed yet, I&#8217;m shocked. </p>
<p>8. Wynston Sawyer &#8211; We also knew this was going to be a tough sign, and he&#8217;ll probably get an overslot bonus. HS teammate told me he expects Sawyer to sign, though. </p>
<p>9. Parker Bridwell &#8211; High upside. If I had to pick any top 10 draftee to go unsigned, I&#8217;d go with Bridwell. </p>
<p>10. Clayton Schrader &#8211; We signed him today. </p>
<p>Overall, I think our negotiations with Klein and Bywater have gone much, much slower than we expected. But as for the others, some sort of delay is normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Questions Answered by SK</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/2010/07/29/all-questions-answered-2/#comment-2757</link>
		<dc:creator>SK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?p=4943#comment-2757</guid>
		<description>Ugh, realized my question didn&#039;t come out right... I meant to ask about the O&#039;s rounds 1-10 draftees, not the top 10 guys. Oh well, still an interesting question.

Thanks for the responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, realized my question didn&#8217;t come out right&#8230; I meant to ask about the O&#8217;s rounds 1-10 draftees, not the top 10 guys. Oh well, still an interesting question.</p>
<p>Thanks for the responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Questions Answered by Jordan</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/2010/07/29/all-questions-answered-2/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?p=4943#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>Dan Klein could progress very quickly. Still very hard to tell at this point. Connor Narron has the highest potential of anyone in the class (beyond Machado). If you are looking for upside, Narron, Wynston Sawyer and Parker Bridwell stand out. If you&#039;re looking for safer bets, Dixon Anderson, Klein and Trent Mummey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Klein could progress very quickly. Still very hard to tell at this point. Connor Narron has the highest potential of anyone in the class (beyond Machado). If you are looking for upside, Narron, Wynston Sawyer and Parker Bridwell stand out. If you&#8217;re looking for safer bets, Dixon Anderson, Klein and Trent Mummey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Questions Answered by kt1000</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/2010/07/29/all-questions-answered-2/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>kt1000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?p=4943#comment-2755</guid>
		<description>Which player in the 2010 Orioles draft, other than Machado, is likely to have impact at the Major League level?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which player in the 2010 Orioles draft, other than Machado, is likely to have impact at the Major League level?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Questions Answered by Jordan</title>
		<link>http://oriolesprospects.com/2010/07/29/all-questions-answered-2/#comment-2753</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oriolesprospects.com/?p=4943#comment-2753</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s how much time every prospect should get, at the very least. 

The Rays leave all of their top pitching prospects in AAA for 40+ starts, not many bust. When they come to the majors they are ready to help out right away. I still don&#039;t understand why other teams haven&#039;t learned from them .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s how much time every prospect should get, at the very least. </p>
<p>The Rays leave all of their top pitching prospects in AAA for 40+ starts, not many bust. When they come to the majors they are ready to help out right away. I still don&#8217;t understand why other teams haven&#8217;t learned from them .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 4.670 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-07-30 17:48:11 -->
